Head-to-Head Comparison

FundingPips vs OneFunded

An honest, data-driven comparison to help you pick the right prop firm. We compare drawdown rules, challenge costs, profit splits, trading conditions, and more — no bias, just facts.

FundingPips

4.3

Provides various evaluation models with scaling systems and profit splits ranging from 60-100% across major CFD categories.

Visit FundingPips

OneFunded

4.2

Accessible prop firm with four challenge formats and accounts from $2K to $200K. Features unlimited evaluation time, competitive pricing, and profit splits up to 90%.

Visit OneFunded

Side-by-Side Comparison: FundingPips vs OneFunded

Metric

FundingPips

OneFunded

Max Drawdown

10%

Daily Drawdown

Profit Target

10%

Profit Split

80/20 → 100/0

80/20 → 90/10

Challenge Cost

$36 - $499

$16 - $780

Trading Period

Unlimited

Min Trading Days

Leverage

1:100

Instruments

Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

Account Sizes

$5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K

$2K, $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K

Scaling

Scale to $2M with consistent performance

Account scaling through consistent performance milestones

News Trading

Allowed

Weekend Holding

Allowed

EA / Bots

Allowed

Rating

4.3/5

4.2/5

The Verdict: FundingPips vs OneFunded

The best choice depends on your trading style, risk tolerance, and goals. Here's our breakdown by trader profile:

Best for Beginners

OneFunded

OneFunded offers lower entry costs, making it easier for newer traders to get started.

Best for Aggressive Traders

FundingPips

FundingPips provides 10% max drawdown allowance, giving aggressive trading styles more breathing room.

Best for Long-term Scaling

FundingPips

FundingPips offers better scaling potential: Scale to $2M with consistent performance.

Best for Overall Value

FundingPips

FundingPips earns 4.3/5 in our analysis, with a strong balance of rules, cost, and trader experience.

FundingPips Pros & Cons

Profit split up to 100%

No time limit on evaluation

Multiple challenge models

Low minimum trading days

Good platform options

Some hidden consistency rules

Lower starting profit split

Can be confusing program choices

Support response times vary

Relatively new brand

OneFunded Pros & Cons

Very low entry cost from just $16

Accounts starting at $2K for beginners

Unlimited evaluation time

Four challenge formats (Value, Core, Flex, Flash)

News trading and EAs allowed

Lower profit split cap at 90%

Consistency rules on most challenges

Newer firm building reputation

Smaller account sizes may limit earnings

Community and support still developing

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, FundingPips or OneFunded?

It depends on your trading style. FundingPips offers 10% max drawdown and a 80/20 → 100/0 profit split, while OneFunded offers 10% max drawdown and a 80/20 → 90/10 split. FundingPips has a higher overall rating at 4.3/5.

What is the cheapest option between FundingPips and OneFunded?

FundingPips challenges start at $36 - $499, while OneFunded starts at $16 - $780. Compare account sizes and what's included before choosing based on price alone.

Can I use EAs or trading bots with FundingPips and OneFunded?

FundingPips allows EAs/bots. OneFunded allows them. Always verify the latest rules on each firm's website.

What are the drawdown rules for FundingPips vs OneFunded?

FundingPips has a 10% max drawdown and 5% daily drawdown. OneFunded has a 10% max drawdown and 5% daily drawdown. Use our free Drawdown Calculator to find your safe lot size for either firm.

How long do I have to pass the FundingPips vs OneFunded challenge?

FundingPips gives you Unlimited. OneFunded gives you Unlimited. Both require a minimum of 3 and 3 trading days respectively.

Which firm has a better profit split, FundingPips or OneFunded?

FundingPips offers a 80/20 → 100/0 profit split, while OneFunded offers 80/20 → 90/10. Higher profit splits mean more of your trading profits go to you.