Head-to-Head Comparison

FundingPips vs TopStep

An honest, data-driven comparison to help you pick the right prop firm. We compare drawdown rules, challenge costs, profit splits, trading conditions, and more — no bias, just facts.

FundingPips

4.3

Provides various evaluation models with scaling systems and profit splits ranging from 60-100% across major CFD categories.

Visit FundingPips

TopStep

4.5

One of the original futures prop firms with a proven track record. Offers a structured Trading Combine evaluation and path to live funded trading with real capital.

Visit TopStep

Side-by-Side Comparison: FundingPips vs TopStep

Metric

FundingPips

TopStep

Max Drawdown

10%

Daily Drawdown

Profit Target

Profit Split

80/20 → 100/0

90/10

Challenge Cost

$36 - $499

$49 - $149/mo

Trading Period

Unlimited

Min Trading Days

Leverage

1:100

Full contract leverage

Instruments

Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

Futures (CME, CBOT, NYMEX, COMEX)

Account Sizes

$5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K

$50K, $100K, $150K

Scaling

Scale to $2M with consistent performance

Path from Express Funded to Live Funded account with real capital

News Trading

Allowed

Weekend Holding

Allowed

Not Allowed

EA / Bots

Allowed

Not Allowed

Rating

4.3/5

4.5/5

The Verdict: FundingPips vs TopStep

The best choice depends on your trading style, risk tolerance, and goals. Here's our breakdown by trader profile:

Best for Beginners

FundingPips

FundingPips offers more forgiving drawdown rules, making it easier for newer traders to get started.

Best for Aggressive Traders

FundingPips

FundingPips provides 10% max drawdown allowance, giving aggressive trading styles more breathing room.

Best for Long-term Scaling

FundingPips

FundingPips offers better scaling potential: Scale to $2M with consistent performance.

Best for Overall Value

TopStep

TopStep earns 4.5/5 in our analysis, with a strong balance of rules, cost, and trader experience.

FundingPips Pros & Cons

Profit split up to 100%

No time limit on evaluation

Multiple challenge models

Low minimum trading days

Good platform options

Some hidden consistency rules

Lower starting profit split

Can be confusing program choices

Support response times vary

Relatively new brand

TopStep Pros & Cons

Established since 2012 with proven track record

Path to real live funded account

Low monthly subscription cost

EOD trailing drawdown (not intraday)

Weekly payouts available

Futures only (no forex)

50% consistency target required

Daily loss limit on some platforms

Intraday trailing drawdown on PRO accounts

No automated trading bots

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, FundingPips or TopStep?

It depends on your trading style. FundingPips offers 10% max drawdown and a 80/20 → 100/0 profit split, while TopStep offers 4% max drawdown and a 90/10 split. TopStep has a higher overall rating at 4.5/5.

What is the cheapest option between FundingPips and TopStep?

FundingPips challenges start at $36 - $499, while TopStep starts at $49 - $149/mo. Compare account sizes and what's included before choosing based on price alone.

Can I use EAs or trading bots with FundingPips and TopStep?

FundingPips allows EAs/bots. TopStep does not allow them. Always verify the latest rules on each firm's website.

What are the drawdown rules for FundingPips vs TopStep?

FundingPips has a 10% max drawdown and 5% daily drawdown. TopStep has a 4% max drawdown and 2% daily drawdown. Use our free Drawdown Calculator to find your safe lot size for either firm.

How long do I have to pass the FundingPips vs TopStep challenge?

FundingPips gives you Unlimited. TopStep gives you Unlimited. Both require a minimum of 3 and 5 trading days respectively.

Which firm has a better profit split, FundingPips or TopStep?

FundingPips offers a 80/20 → 100/0 profit split, while TopStep offers 90/10. Higher profit splits mean more of your trading profits go to you.